Evaluation report

• Repository is reachable

  https://github.com/Intina47/context-sync @ 235fd51 — ★ 179 · TypeScript · MIT · last push 2 months ago

• Manifest detected

  kind=mcp slug=context-sync-server · source=package.json

• Slug is URL-safe

  "context-sync-server" matches /^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]{0,62}$/

• Slug is unique within kind

  No collision found for mcp/context-sync-server

• Version is semver

  2.0.0

• Description qualitywarn

  Only 5 words · 34 chars — more detail helps discovery

  Tell consumers what this artifact does in a full sentence.

• README is present and substantial

  3,377 chars · 9 sections · 4 code blocks

• Tags / topics declared

  37 total — context sync, context management, mcp, mcp-server, model-context-protocol, ai (+31)

• README has usage / example sections

  no labeled section but 4 code blocks document usage

• Homepage / docs URL declared

  https://github.com/Intina47/context-sync#readme

• Dependencies: known vulnerabilitieswarn

  5 high/critical advisories — @modelcontextprotocol/[email protected] (HIGH: GHSA-8r9q-7v3j-jr4g) · @modelcontextprotocol/[email protected] (HIGH: GHSA-w48q-cv73-mx4w) (+3)

  Update the affected packages, then re-publish. (`npm audit` shows the same data locally.)

• LICENSE file at repo root

  LICENSE

• No sensitive files in the repo

  scanned for .env, credentials.json, *.pem, .ssh/, AWS / GCP configs — none found

• MCP: launch path

  bin: context-sync, context-sync-setup · scripts.start

• MCP: @modelcontextprotocol/sdk in dependencies

  pinned at "^0.5.0"

• MCP: SDK version pinned

  pinned at "^0.5.0"

• MCP: ESM package

  "type": "module"

• MCP: server surface

  0 tools

• Tests detectedwarn

  no test/tests/__tests__/spec/t/ dirs, no JVM src/test/, and no JS/TS/Python/Go/Ruby/Elixir test files

  Add tests (even a smoke test). Consumers gauge maintenance quality by their presence.

• CI configuration detectedwarn

  no CI config found (looked for GitHub Actions, CircleCI, GitLab CI, etc.)

  Add a simple workflow (lint + test on PR) — it tells consumers the artifact is built reproducibly.

• Recent activity

  last push 2 months ago

This artifact hasn't produced behavioral results yet: the evaluation sandbox couldn't run it (it may need credentials we don't provide, or a build our environment doesn't support). That's a limitation of our environment, not a verdict on the artifact.