perf-review
Performance impact assessment for items with the needs-perf-review trait. Evaluates hot paths, query patterns, and measurement plans. Invoked via skillPointer when filling performance-baseline notes.
pinned to #c42244bupdated 2 weeks ago
Ask your AI client: “install skills/perf-review”.
Requires the metahub MCP server installed in your client. Set up MCP.
mh install skills/perf-reviewmetahub onboarded this repo on the author's behalf.
If you own github.com/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator on GitHub, claim the listing to take over publishing. Your claim preserves the existing eval history and badges; only the curator label is replaced with verified-publisher on your next publish.
Stars
196
Last commit
2 weeks ago
Latest release
published
- #ai-coding-assistant
- #ai-development
- #ai-harness
- #ai-memory
- #ai-tools
- #claude
- #claude-code
- #claude-desktop
- #context-persistence
- #developer-tools
- #harness-engineering
- #harness-framework
- #mcp
- #mcp-server
- #model-context-protocol
- #task-management
- #vibe-coding
- #workflow-automation
About this skill
Pulled from SKILL.md at publish time.
Evaluate performance impact of changes. This project is a Kotlin MCP server with SQLite via Exposed ORM, handling tool calls synchronously per request.
Evaluation report
WarningsAutomated checks the publisher passed at publish time — structure, docs, safety, and whether the artifact behaves as claimed.c42244b· 2 weeks ago
Kind-specific
31Skill: SKILL.md present
found at .claude/skills/perf-review/SKILL.md · frontmatter source: SKILL.md
Skill: body content present
429 words · 2,660 chars · 6 sections
Skill: triggers declaredwarn
No `trigger` phrases in SKILL.md frontmatter
Add `trigger:` lines so Claude knows when to activate this skill — e.g. `when building MCP servers` or `for diagram creation`.
Skill: allowed-tools scope
no allowed-tools restriction (Claude may use anything)
Release history
1- releasecurrentc42244bwarn2 weeks ago
Contents
Performance Review Framework
Evaluate performance impact of changes. This project is a Kotlin MCP server with SQLite via Exposed ORM, handling tool calls synchronously per request.
Step 1: Hot Path Analysis
Identify which hot paths the change touches:
- Per-request paths — MCP tool execution (every tool call hits this). New work here adds latency to every request.
- Per-item loops — operations that iterate over items (search, overview, stalled-item detection). N+1 patterns here scale poorly.
- Startup path — server initialization, database schema creation, config loading. Affects container startup time.
- Background operations — cascade detection, dependency resolution. Runs inline, not async.
Step 2: Database Query Patterns
- N+1 queries — does the change add a query inside a loop? (e.g.,
countChildrenByRoleper child in overview). Count total queries for a typical operation. - Full table scans — any
selectAll()without filters on large tables? - Missing indexes — new filter conditions that would benefit from an index?
- Transaction scope — are transactions held open longer than necessary?
- Aggregate vs fetch-all — using
SELECT COUNT(*)withGROUP BYvs fetching all rows and counting in memory?
Step 3: JSON/Serialization Cost
- Large response payloads — does the change add fields that significantly increase response size? (e.g., adding
childCountsto every child in overview) - Repeated serialization — same object serialized multiple times in one request?
- String parsing —
PropertiesHelper.extractTraits()parses JSON on every call. Acceptable for small objects, flag if called in tight loops.
Step 4: Complexity Analysis
- What is N? — identify the scaling variable (number of items, children, notes, dependencies)
- Current complexity — O(1), O(N), O(N*M)? Where does the change sit?
- Realistic scale — what's the expected N in practice? (Most projects: <100 items, <30 children per root)
- Worst case — what happens at 1000+ items? Does it degrade gracefully or hit a wall?
Step 5: Measurement Plan
- How to verify — what should be measured before/after? (query count, response time, payload size)
- Baseline — document current performance for the affected operation
- Acceptance threshold — what's the maximum acceptable degradation?
Output
Compose the performance-baseline note with findings from each step. This note is optional (required: false) — use it when the change touches known hot paths or adds significant new work.
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first.
Related
Frontend Slides
Create beautiful slides on the web using Claude's frontend skills
Gpt Researcher
An autonomous agent that conducts deep research on any data using any LLM providers
orchestration-patterns
>
mh install skills/perf-review