Evaluation report
Warningsnutrition-analyzer · skill27c2603· 3 months ago
Every check MetaHub ran on this artifact, grouped by area. Static checks run on the source at publish time; behavioral checks run the artifact in a sandbox and judge what it actually does.
Structural
5 passedRepository is reachable
https://github.com/huifer/WellAlly-health @ 27c2603 — ★ 895 · Shell · MIT · last push 6 months ago
Manifest detected
kind=skill slug=nutrition-analyzer · path=.claude/skills/nutrition-analyzer · source=SKILL.md
Slug is URL-safe
"nutrition-analyzer" matches /^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]{0,62}$/
Slug is unique within kind
No collision found for skill/nutrition-analyzer
Version is semver
0.1.0
Documentation
5 passedDescription quality
46 words · 52 chars — "分析营养数据、识别营养模式、评估营养状况,并提供个性化营养建议。支持与运动、睡眠、慢性病数据的关联分析。"
README is present and substantial
9,400 chars · 11 sections · 2 code blocks
Tags / topics declared
4 total — claude, claude-code, health, health-data
README has usage / example sections
found: Quick Start
Homepage / docs URL declared
https://www.wellally.tech/
Safety
2 passedLICENSE file at repo root
LICENSE
No sensitive files in the repo
scanned for .env, credentials.json, *.pem, .ssh/, AWS / GCP configs — none found
Kind-specific
3 passed1 warningSkill: triggers declaredwarn
No `trigger` phrases in SKILL.md frontmatter
Add `trigger:` lines so Claude knows when to activate this skill — e.g. `when building MCP servers` or `for diagram creation`.
Skill: SKILL.md present
found at .claude/skills/nutrition-analyzer/SKILL.md · frontmatter source: SKILL.md
Skill: body content present
4,695 words · 13,174 chars · 55 sections · 8 code blocks
Skill: allowed-tools scope
4 declared: Read, Grep, Glob, Write
Maintenance
3 warningsRecent activitywarn
last push 6 months ago — looks slowing down
Consumers prefer artifacts that are actively maintained (threshold: 90 days, configurable via EVAL_RECENCY_PASS_DAYS).
Tests detectedwarn
no test/tests/__tests__/spec/t/ dirs, no JVM src/test/, and no JS/TS/Python/Go/Ruby/Elixir test files
Add tests (even a smoke test). Consumers gauge maintenance quality by their presence.
CI configuration detectedwarn
no CI config found (looked for GitHub Actions, CircleCI, GitLab CI, etc.)
Add a simple workflow (lint + test on PR) — it tells consumers the artifact is built reproducibly.
Behavioral
Behavioral results aren't published for this artifact. The publisher sees the full report on their own dashboard.