earnings-trade-analyzer
Analyze recent post-earnings stocks using a 5-factor scoring system (Gap Size, Pre-Earnings Trend, Volume Trend, MA200 Position, MA50 Position). Scores each stock 0-100 and assigns A/B/C/D grades. Use when user asks about earnings trade analysis, post-earnings momentum screening, earnings gap scoring, or finding best recent earnings reactions.
pinned to #4ff3f81updated 2 weeks ago
Ask your AI client: “install skills/earnings-trade-analyzer”.
Requires the metahub MCP server installed in your client. Set up MCP.
mh install skills/earnings-trade-analyzermetahub onboarded this repo on the author's behalf.
If you own github.com/tradermonty/claude-trading-skills on GitHub, claim the listing to take over publishing. Your claim preserves the existing eval history and badges; only the curator label is replaced with verified-publisher on your next publish.
Stars
2,337
Last commit
2 weeks ago
Latest release
published
About this skill
Pulled from SKILL.md at publish time.
Analyze recent post-earnings stocks using a 5-factor weighted scoring system to identify the strongest earnings reactions for potential momentum trades.
Evaluation report
WarningsAutomated checks the publisher passed at publish time — structure, docs, safety, and whether the artifact behaves as claimed.4ff3f81· 2 weeks ago
Documentation
22Description quality
47 words · 345 chars — "Analyze recent post-earnings stocks using a 5-factor scoring system (Gap Size, P…"
README is present and substantialwarn
README present but its contents couldn't be read this scan
Transient fetch issue — re-run the eval to grade the README's substance.
Tags / topics declaredwarn
No manifest tags and no GitHub repo topics
Add tags to the manifest (or GitHub topics on the repo) so the registry's search and category filters surface this artifact.
Homepage / docs URL declared
no homepage declared (registry will use the repo URL) — info-only, not blocking
Release history
1- releasecurrent4ff3f81warn2 weeks ago
Contents
Analyze recent post-earnings stocks using a 5-factor weighted scoring system to identify the strongest earnings reactions for potential momentum trades.
When to Use
- User asks for post-earnings trade analysis or earnings gap screening
- User wants to find the best recent earnings reactions
- User requests earnings momentum scoring or grading
- User asks about post-earnings accumulation day (PEAD) candidates
Prerequisites
- FMP API key (set
FMP_API_KEYenvironment variable or pass--api-key) - Free tier (250 calls/day) is sufficient for default screening (lookback 2 days, top 20)
- Paid tier recommended for larger lookback windows or full screening
Workflow
Step 1: Run the Earnings Trade Analyzer
Execute the analyzer script:
# Default: last 2 days of earnings, top 20 results
python3 skills/earnings-trade-analyzer/scripts/analyze_earnings_trades.py --output-dir reports/
# Custom lookback and market cap filter
python3 skills/earnings-trade-analyzer/scripts/analyze_earnings_trades.py \
--lookback-days 5 \
--min-market-cap 1000000000 \
--top 30 \
--output-dir reports/
# With entry quality filter
python3 skills/earnings-trade-analyzer/scripts/analyze_earnings_trades.py \
--apply-entry-filter \
--output-dir reports/
Degraded endpoint / budget fallback for scheduled reviews
If the analyzer reports a 404, an implausible empty earnings calendar, or exhausts its API-call budget before producing scored candidates during a scheduled after-close/pre-market run, do not report "no earnings reactions" immediately.
- First retry once with a narrower liquid-universe configuration so the full 5-factor scorer has a chance to complete, for example:
python3 skills/earnings-trade-analyzer/scripts/analyze_earnings_trades.py \
--lookback-days 2 \
--min-market-cap 5000000000 \
--top 20 \
--max-api-calls 600 \
--output-dir reports/<routine-date>
- If the scored run still returns no candidates or cannot complete, verify the same range through the stable endpoint used by the compatibility shim and clearly label the result as an ungraded fallback:
curl "https://financialmodelingprep.com/stable/earnings-calendar?from=YYYY-MM-DD&to=YYYY-MM-DD&apikey=$FMP_API_KEY"
Then optionally enrich returned US tickers through the analyzer's stable-first FMP client or per-symbol /stable/quote?symbol=<ticker> calls to rank by same-day changesPercentage, market cap, and liquidity. Use legacy /api/v3 quote calls only as a legacy-key fallback after stable has failed. Present these as preliminary / ungraded reactions because the 5-factor scorer did not run; do not assign A/B/C/D grades from the fallback alone.
No-candidate output pitfall: The analyzer may print Candidates after filtering: 0 / No candidates found matching criteria. and exit successfully without writing an earnings_trade_analyzer_*.json file. In that case, do not try to run PEAD Mode B from a nonexistent candidate file. Say explicitly that no scored analyzer JSON was produced, run the endpoint/quote enrichment fallback above if the routine needs an earnings section, and label any names as manual-review only.
Step 2: Review Results
- Read the generated JSON and Markdown reports
- Load
references/scoring_methodology.mdfor scoring interpretation context - Focus on Grade A and B stocks for actionable setups
Step 3: Present Analysis
For each top candidate, present:
- Composite score and letter grade (A/B/C/D)
- Earnings gap size and direction
- Pre-earnings 20-day trend
- Volume ratio (20-day vs 60-day average)
- Position relative to 200-day and 50-day moving averages
- Weakest and strongest scoring components
Step 4: Provide Actionable Guidance
Based on grades:
- Grade A (85+): Strong earnings reaction with institutional accumulation - consider entry
- Grade B (70-84): Good earnings reaction worth monitoring - wait for pullback or confirmation
- Grade C (55-69): Mixed signals - use caution, additional analysis needed
- Grade D (<55): Weak setup - avoid or wait for better conditions
Output
earnings_trade_analyzer_YYYY-MM-DD_HHMMSS.json- Structured results with schema_version "1.0"earnings_trade_analyzer_YYYY-MM-DD_HHMMSS.md- Human-readable report with tables
Resources
references/scoring_methodology.md- 5-factor scoring system, grade thresholds, and entry quality filter rules
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first.
Related
Verification Before Completion
Evidence before assertions, always
Writing Plans
Turn specs into phased implementation plans
Test-Driven Development
Red → green → refactor discipline for any feature or bugfix
mh install skills/earnings-trade-analyzer