biz-dupont
Apply DuPont Analysis to decompose Return on Equity (ROE) into profitability, efficiency, and leverage components. Use this skill when the user needs to diagnose why ROE is high or low, compare financial performance drivers across companies, or identify which operational lever to pull — even if they say 'why is our ROE declining' or 'how do we improve returns'.
pinned to #4e7f4f8updated last month
Ask your AI client: “install skills/biz-dupont”.
Requires the metahub MCP server installed in your client. Set up MCP.
mh install skills/biz-dupontmetahub onboarded this repo on the author's behalf.
If you own github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills on GitHub, claim the listing to take over publishing. Your claim preserves the existing eval history and badges; only the curator label is replaced with verified-publisher on your next publish.
Stars
225
Last commit
last month
Latest release
published
- #ai-agent
- #anthropic
- #claude
- #claude-agent-skills
- #claude-code
- #coding-agent
- #knowledge-base
- #mcp
- #methodology
- #open-source
- #prompt-engineering
- #skills
- #taiwan
Automated checks the publisher passed at publish time — structure, docs, safety, and whether the artifact behaves as claimed.4e7f4f8· last month
Behavioral checks ran but aren't published for this artifact; the static checks above ran at publish time.
Documentation
8 passed1 warningHomepage or repository declaredwarn
No homepage or repository declared.
Add a "homepage" or "repository" field to SKILL.md.
Description quality
59 words · 363 chars — "Apply DuPont Analysis to decompose Return on Equity (ROE) into profitability, ef…"
README is present and substantial
33,936 chars · 20 sections · 3 code blocks
Tags / topics declared
13 total — ai-agent, anthropic, claude, claude-agent-skills, claude-code, coding-agent (+7)
README has usage / example sections
no labeled section but 3 code blocks document usage
Homepage / docs URL declared
https://vault.asgard-ai.com/skills/
Description is substantive
Description is 59 words.
Documentation present and substantive
Documentation present (SKILL.md, 866 words).
Documentation shows usage
Documentation includes 3 code examples.
Release history
1- releasecurrent4e7f4f8warnlast month
Contents
DuPont Analysis
Overview
DuPont decomposes ROE into three multiplicative components: Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Equity Multiplier. This reveals whether ROE is driven by profitability, efficiency, or leverage — critical for diagnosis and comparison.
When to Use
Trigger conditions:
- User asks "why is our ROE high/low?"
- User comparing financial performance across companies
- User needs to identify which operational lever improves returns
- User analyzing profitability beyond top-line metrics
When NOT to use:
- For company valuation → use DCF
- For comprehensive ratio analysis → use Financial Ratios skill
- For strategic positioning → use SWOT
Framework
IRON LAW: Three-Factor Decomposition
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Equity Multiplier
= (Net Income/Revenue) × (Revenue/Total Assets) × (Total Assets/Equity)
All three factors MUST be calculated and analyzed. Reporting ROE without
decomposition is like reporting a fever without checking symptoms.
IRON LAW: High Leverage ≠ Good Performance
A high Equity Multiplier (Assets/Equity) inflates ROE through debt.
A company with 5% margin, 1.0x turnover, and 6x leverage has ROE of 30% —
but is one bad quarter away from insolvency. Always flag when leverage
is the dominant driver.
Step 1: Calculate the Three Components
| Component | Formula | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Net Profit Margin | Net Income / Revenue | Profitability — how much of each dollar of revenue becomes profit |
| Asset Turnover | Revenue / Total Assets | Efficiency — how well assets generate revenue |
| Equity Multiplier | Total Assets / Shareholders' Equity | Leverage — how much debt amplifies equity returns |
Step 2: Diagnose the Driver
Compare each component to industry benchmarks and trends:
- Margin-driven ROE: Premium brands, tech companies (high margin, lower turnover)
- Turnover-driven ROE: Retail, fast food (low margin, high turnover)
- Leverage-driven ROE: Banks, real estate (moderate margin, high leverage) — flag the risk
Step 3: Trend Analysis
Calculate DuPont components for 3-5 years. Identify:
- Which component is improving/declining?
- Is improving ROE driven by operations (margin, turnover) or financial engineering (leverage)?
Step 4: Peer Comparison
Compare DuPont components across competitors to identify relative strengths/weaknesses.
Output Format
⚠️ Decimal vs percent: The bundled script returns ROE and all margin/burden components as decimals (
0.2014means 20.14%, NOT20.14). The narrative table below renders them as percentages for humans, but JSON outputs and any downstream pipeline must use decimals consistently.
# DuPont Analysis: {Company}
## ROE Decomposition
| Component | Value | Industry Avg | Trend (3yr) |
|-----------|-------|-------------|-------------|
| Net Profit Margin | X% | X% | ↑/↓/→ |
| Asset Turnover | X.Xx | X.Xx | ↑/↓/→ |
| Equity Multiplier | X.Xx | X.Xx | ↑/↓/→ |
| **ROE** | **X%** | **X%** | ↑/↓/→ |
## Diagnosis
- Primary ROE driver: {margin / turnover / leverage}
- Risk flag: {leverage concern if applicable}
## Peer Comparison
| Company | Margin | Turnover | Leverage | ROE |
|---------|--------|----------|----------|-----|
| {Company} | X% | X.Xx | X.Xx | X% |
| {Peer A} | ... | ... | ... | ... |
## Recommendations
1. {Which lever to improve and how}
Examples
Correct Application
Scenario: DuPont for two Taiwanese retailers
| Company A | Company B | |
|---|---|---|
| Net Profit Margin | 2% | 8% |
| Asset Turnover | 3.5x | 1.2x |
| Equity Multiplier | 2.0x | 2.0x |
| ROE | 14% | 19.2% |
Diagnosis: Company A is turnover-driven (high-volume, low-margin retail). Company B is margin-driven (premium positioning). Both have similar leverage — ROE difference comes from operations ✓
Incorrect Application
- ROE is 25% and reported as "excellent" without decomposition. Turns out: Margin 3%, Turnover 1.0x, Leverage 8.3x → Almost entirely leverage-driven, extremely risky. Violates Iron Law: must decompose.
Gotchas
- Extended 5-factor DuPont: For deeper analysis, decompose margin into Tax Burden × Interest Burden × Operating Margin. Useful when comparing across tax jurisdictions.
- Negative equity breaks the model: Companies with accumulated losses can have negative equity, making the multiplier meaningless. Note and use alternative metrics.
- One-time items distort margin: Use normalized/adjusted net income to avoid single-year spikes from asset sales, write-downs, or legal settlements.
- Turnover varies wildly by industry: Asset-light businesses (SaaS) have naturally high turnover. Capital-heavy businesses (manufacturing) have low turnover. Compare within industry only.
Scripts
| Script | Description | Usage |
|---|---|---|
scripts/dupont.py | Decompose ROE into 3-factor or 5-factor DuPont components | python scripts/dupont.py --help |
Run python scripts/dupont.py --verify to execute built-in sanity tests.
References
- For 5-factor DuPont extension, see
references/extended-dupont.md
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first.
Related
Verification Before Completion
Evidence before assertions, always
Writing Plans
Turn specs into phased implementation plans
Test-Driven Development
Red → green → refactor discipline for any feature or bugfix
mh install skills/biz-dupont