algo-seo-technical
Optimize Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) for better search rankings and user experience. Use this skill when the user needs to diagnose page speed issues, improve Largest Contentful Paint, reduce layout shift, or pass Google's page experience signals — even if they say 'my site is slow', 'Core Web Vitals failing', or 'page speed optimization'.
pinned to #4e7f4f8updated last month
Ask your AI client: “install skills/algo-seo-technical”.
Requires the metahub MCP server installed in your client. Set up MCP.
mh install skills/algo-seo-technicalmetahub onboarded this repo on the author's behalf.
If you own github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills on GitHub, claim the listing to take over publishing. Your claim preserves the existing eval history and badges; only the curator label is replaced with verified-publisher on your next publish.
Stars
225
Last commit
last month
Latest release
published
- #ai-agent
- #anthropic
- #claude
- #claude-agent-skills
- #claude-code
- #coding-agent
- #knowledge-base
- #mcp
- #methodology
- #open-source
- #prompt-engineering
- #skills
- #taiwan
Automated checks the publisher passed at publish time — structure, docs, safety, and whether the artifact behaves as claimed.4e7f4f8· last month
Documentation
8 passed1 warningHomepage or repository declaredwarn
No homepage or repository declared.
Add a "homepage" or "repository" field to SKILL.md.
Description quality
56 words · 345 chars — "Optimize Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) for better search rankings and user exp…"
README is present and substantial
33,936 chars · 20 sections · 3 code blocks
Tags / topics declared
13 total — ai-agent, anthropic, claude, claude-agent-skills, claude-code, coding-agent (+7)
README has usage / example sections
no labeled section but 3 code blocks document usage
Homepage / docs URL declared
https://vault.asgard-ai.com/skills/
Description is substantive
Description is 56 words.
Documentation present and substantive
Documentation present (SKILL.md, 643 words).
Documentation shows usage
Documentation includes 2 code examples.
Release history
1- releasecurrent4e7f4f8warnlast month
Contents
Core Web Vitals Optimization
Overview
Core Web Vitals are Google's page experience metrics: LCP (loading), INP (interactivity), and CLS (visual stability). Measured on real user data (CrUX). Pass thresholds: LCP < 2.5s, INP < 200ms, CLS < 0.1.
When to Use
Trigger conditions:
- Diagnosing why a site fails Core Web Vitals assessment
- Optimizing page load performance for SEO
- Reducing layout shift or improving interactivity
When NOT to use:
- When the issue is content relevance, not speed (use content SEO)
- When analyzing link authority (use PageRank / backlink analysis)
Algorithm
IRON LAW: CrUX Field Data Is the Source of Truth
Lab scores (Lighthouse) that pass can still FAIL in the field.
Google ranks based on REAL USER data (75th percentile):
- LCP < 2.5s (Good), 2.5-4.0s (Needs Improvement), > 4.0s (Poor)
- INP < 200ms (Good), 200-500ms (Needs Improvement), > 500ms (Poor)
- CLS < 0.1 (Good), 0.1-0.25 (Needs Improvement), > 0.25 (Poor)
Phase 1: Input Validation
Collect field data from CrUX API or Search Console. Run Lighthouse for lab baseline. Identify which metrics fail. Gate: Have both field and lab data; failing metrics identified.
Phase 2: Core Algorithm
LCP fixes: 1. Optimize largest element (hero image/text). 2. Preload critical resources. 3. Reduce server response time (TTFB). 4. Eliminate render-blocking resources.
INP fixes: 1. Break long tasks (> 50ms) into smaller chunks. 2. Reduce JavaScript execution time. 3. Use requestIdleCallback for non-critical work. 4. Minimize main thread blocking.
CLS fixes: 1. Set explicit dimensions on images/videos. 2. Reserve space for ads/embeds. 3. Avoid inserting content above existing content. 4. Use CSS contain for dynamic elements.
Phase 3: Verification
Re-run Lighthouse, deploy, then monitor CrUX for 28-day rolling average improvement. Gate: Lab scores pass; await field data confirmation (28-day cycle).
Phase 4: Output
Return audit results with specific fix recommendations prioritized by impact.
Output Format
{
"audit": {"lcp": {"value_ms": 3200, "status": "poor", "element": "hero-image.jpg", "fixes": ["preload", "compress"]}},
"metadata": {"url": "...", "data_source": "crux", "device": "mobile"}
}
Examples
Sample I/O
Input: URL with LCP=4.1s, CLS=0.32, INP=150ms Expected: LCP and CLS flagged as poor; INP passes. Fix priorities: CLS (image dimensions) → LCP (hero image preload)
Edge Cases
| Input | Expected | Why |
|---|---|---|
| SPA with client rendering | High LCP likely | No server-rendered content for LCP element |
| Page with ads | High CLS likely | Ad slots inject content dynamically |
| All metrics pass in lab | May still fail field | Real devices on slow networks differ from lab |
Gotchas
- Lab vs field gap: Lighthouse runs on a simulated fast device. Real users on 3G with old phones produce very different numbers.
- LCP element changes: The LCP element can differ across page loads (image vs text). Optimize for the MOST COMMON LCP element, not just one.
- CLS attribution: Layout shifts are blamed on the element that moved, but the CAUSE is often an element inserted above it. Trace the cause, not the symptom.
- INP replaced FID: As of March 2024, INP replaces FID. Old references to FID are outdated.
- 28-day lag: CrUX uses a 28-day rolling window. Fixes take up to a month to reflect in field data.
References
- For element-specific optimization techniques, see
references/optimization-techniques.md - For CrUX API usage and monitoring setup, see
references/crux-monitoring.md
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first.
Related
Verification Before Completion
Evidence before assertions, always
Writing Plans
Turn specs into phased implementation plans
Test-Driven Development
Red → green → refactor discipline for any feature or bugfix
mh install skills/algo-seo-technical