Evaluation report

• Repository is reachable

  https://github.com/JaredStewart/coderlm @ fe046e1 — ★ 291 · Rust · MIT · last push 2 months ago

• Manifest detected

  kind=plugin slug=coderlm · path=plugin/.claude-plugin · source=plugin.json

• Slug is URL-safe

  "coderlm" matches /^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]{0,62}$/

• Slug is unique within kind

  No collision found for plugin/coderlm

• Version is semver

  0.1.6

• Tags / topics declaredwarn

  No manifest tags and no GitHub repo topics

  Add tags to the manifest (or GitHub topics on the repo) so the registry's search and category filters surface this artifact.

• Description quality

  19 words · 150 chars — "Tree-sitter backed code indexing and retrieval for Claude Code. Precise function…"

• README is present and substantial

  7,521 chars · 10 sections · 12 code blocks

• README has usage / example sections

  found: Quick Start

• Homepage / docs URL declared

  https://github.com/JaredStewart/coderlm

• LICENSE file at repo root

  LICENSE

• No sensitive files in the repo

  scanned for .env, credentials.json, *.pem, .ssh/, AWS / GCP configs — none found

• Plugin: bundled artifacts presentwarn

  Couldn't find a skills/ subdir or an MCP server config inside the plugin

  A plugin is most useful when it bundles ≥ 1 skill or an MCP server.

• Plugin: manifest fields complete

• Plugin: bundle shape

  empty bundle

• Plugin: manifest location

  manifest at plugin.json

• Tests detectedwarn

  no test/tests/__tests__/spec/t/ dirs, no JVM src/test/, and no JS/TS/Python/Go/Ruby/Elixir test files

  Add tests (even a smoke test). Consumers gauge maintenance quality by their presence.

• CI configuration detectedwarn

  no CI config found (looked for GitHub Actions, CircleCI, GitLab CI, etc.)

  Add a simple workflow (lint + test on PR) — it tells consumers the artifact is built reproducibly.

• Recent activity

  last push 2 months ago

Behavioral results aren't published for this artifact. The publisher sees the full report on their own dashboard.