Evaluation report
Warningscoderabbit · plugin2fd091d· 3 months ago
Every check MetaHub ran on this artifact, grouped by area. Static checks run on the source at publish time; behavioral checks run the artifact in a sandbox and judge what it actually does.
Structural
5 passedRepository is reachable
https://github.com/coderabbitai/skills @ 2fd091d — ★ 123 · MIT · last push 2 days ago
Manifest detected
kind=plugin slug=coderabbit · source=.claude-plugin/plugin.json
Slug is URL-safe
"coderabbit" matches /^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]{0,62}$/
Slug is unique within kind
No collision found for plugin/coderabbit
Version is semver
1.1.1
Documentation
4 passed1 warningTags / topics declaredwarn
No manifest tags and no GitHub repo topics
Add tags to the manifest (or GitHub topics on the repo) so the registry's search and category filters surface this artifact.
Description quality
9 words · 60 chars — OK but more detail helps
README is present and substantial
9,519 chars · 9 sections · 5 code blocks
README has usage / example sections
found: Quickstart · Installation · Usage
Homepage / docs URL declared
https://docs.coderabbit.ai/cli/claude-code-integration
Safety
2 passedLICENSE file at repo root
LICENSE
No sensitive files in the repo
scanned for .env, credentials.json, *.pem, .ssh/, AWS / GCP configs — none found
Kind-specific
4 passedPlugin: manifest fields complete
Plugin: bundled artifacts present
2 skills
Plugin: bundle shape
2 skills · 1 command · 1 subagent
Plugin: manifest location
manifest at .claude-plugin/plugin.json (modern convention)
Maintenance
2 passed1 warningTests detectedwarn
no test/tests/__tests__/spec/t/ dirs, no JVM src/test/, and no JS/TS/Python/Go/Ruby/Elixir test files
Add tests (even a smoke test). Consumers gauge maintenance quality by their presence.
Recent activity
last push 2 days ago
CI configuration detected
GitHub Actions (2 workflows)