Evaluation report

• Repository is reachable

  https://github.com/adamjgmiller/adamsreview @ b5b8ef4 — ★ 240 · Shell · MIT · last push 7 weeks ago

• Manifest detected

  kind=plugin slug=adamsreview · source=.claude-plugin/plugin.json

• Slug is URL-safe

  "adamsreview" matches /^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]{0,62}$/

• Slug is unique within kind

  No collision found for plugin/adamsreview

• Version is semver

  0.4.3

• Tags / topics declaredwarn

  No manifest tags and no GitHub repo topics

  Add tags to the manifest (or GitHub topics on the repo) so the registry's search and category filters surface this artifact.

• Description quality

  18 words · 152 chars — "Multi-lens code review pipeline: deep review (Claude or Codex), automated fix lo…"

• README is present and substantial

  22,163 chars · 7 sections · 4 code blocks

• README has usage / example sections

  found: Installation

• Homepage / docs URL declared

  no homepage declared (registry will use the repo URL) — info-only, not blocking

• LICENSE file at repo root

  LICENSE

• No sensitive files in the repo

  scanned for .env, credentials.json, *.pem, .ssh/, AWS / GCP configs — none found

• Plugin: bundled artifacts presentwarn

  Couldn't find a skills/ subdir or an MCP server config inside the plugin

  A plugin is most useful when it bundles ≥ 1 skill or an MCP server.

• Plugin: manifest fields complete

• Plugin: bundle shape

  6 commands

• Plugin: manifest location

  manifest at .claude-plugin/plugin.json (modern convention)

• CI configuration detectedwarn

  no CI config found (looked for GitHub Actions, CircleCI, GitLab CI, etc.)

  Add a simple workflow (lint + test on PR) — it tells consumers the artifact is built reproducibly.

• Recent activity

  last push 7 weeks ago

• Tests detected

  1 test directory

Behavioral results aren't published for this artifact. The publisher sees the full report on their own dashboard.