Evaluation report
Warningsselene · mcp8ada9d2· 3 months ago
Every check MetaHub ran on this artifact, grouped by area. Static checks run on the source at publish time; behavioral checks run the artifact in a sandbox and judge what it actually does.
Structural
5 passedRepository is reachable
https://github.com/tercumantanumut/selene @ 8ada9d2 — ★ 169 · TypeScript · MIT · last push yesterday
Manifest detected
kind=mcp slug=selene · source=package.json
Slug is URL-safe
"selene" matches /^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]{0,62}$/
Slug is unique within kind
No collision found for mcp/selene
Version is semver
0.3.5
Documentation
3 passed2 warningsDescription qualitywarn
Only 6 words · 32 chars — more detail helps discovery
Tell consumers what this artifact does in a full sentence.
README has usage / example sectionswarn
README has no Usage / Example / Quick start / Installation heading at any level
Add a `# Usage`, `## Quick start`, or similar section so end users can copy/paste a working invocation. Code blocks alone work too if there are several.
README is present and substantial
10,430 chars · 10 sections · 2 code blocks
Tags / topics declared
17 total — agent, antigravity, codebase-indexing, codex, deferred-loading, diffusion-models (+11)
Homepage / docs URL declared
https://selene.engineer
Safety
2 passed1 warningDependencies: known vulnerabilitieswarn
1 high/critical advisory — @modelcontextprotocol/[email protected] (HIGH: GHSA-345p-7cg4-v4c7)
Update the affected packages, then re-publish. (`npm audit` shows the same data locally.)
LICENSE file at repo root
LICENSE
No sensitive files in the repo
scanned for .env, credentials.json, *.pem, .ssh/, AWS / GCP configs — none found
Kind-specific
4 passed1 warningMCP: ESM packagewarn
package.json missing "type": "module"
Modern MCP servers are ESM. Add `"type": "module"` unless you have a CJS-only reason.
MCP: launch path
scripts.start
MCP: @modelcontextprotocol/sdk in dependencies
pinned at "^1.25.2"
MCP: SDK version pinned
pinned at "^1.25.2"
MCP: server surface
0 tools
Maintenance
2 passed1 warningCI configuration detectedwarn
no CI config found (looked for GitHub Actions, CircleCI, GitLab CI, etc.)
Add a simple workflow (lint + test on PR) — it tells consumers the artifact is built reproducibly.
Recent activity
last push yesterday
Tests detected
16 test directories · 333 test files
Behavioral
This artifact hasn't produced behavioral results yet: the evaluation sandbox couldn't run it (it may need credentials we don't provide, or a build our environment doesn't support). That's a limitation of our environment, not a verdict on the artifact.