Evaluation report

• Repository is reachable

  https://github.com/DayuanJiang/next-ai-draw-io @ 5c88476 — ★ 32,164 · TypeScript · Apache-2.0 · last push 3 days ago

• Manifest detected

  kind=mcp slug=next-ai-drawio-mcp-server · path=packages/mcp-server · source=package.json

• Slug is URL-safe

  "next-ai-drawio-mcp-server" matches /^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]{0,62}$/

• Slug is unique within kind

  No collision found for mcp/next-ai-drawio-mcp-server

• Version is semver

  0.2.1

• Description quality

  14 words · 93 chars — OK but more detail helps

• README is present and substantial

  11,207 chars · 11 sections · 4 code blocks

• Tags / topics declared

  8 total — mcp, drawio, diagram, ai, claude, model-context-protocol (+2)

• README has usage / example sections

  found: Example · Getting Started · Installation

• Homepage / docs URL declared

  https://next-ai-drawio.jiang.jp

• Dependencies: known vulnerabilitieswarn

  2 high/critical advisories — @modelcontextprotocol/[email protected] (HIGH: GHSA-8r9q-7v3j-jr4g) · @modelcontextprotocol/[email protected] (HIGH: GHSA-w48q-cv73-mx4w)

  Update the affected packages, then re-publish. (`npm audit` shows the same data locally.)

• LICENSE file at repo root

  LICENSE

• No sensitive files in the repo

  scanned for .env, credentials.json, *.pem, .ssh/, AWS / GCP configs — none found

• MCP: launch path

  bin: next-ai-drawio-mcp · scripts.start

• MCP: @modelcontextprotocol/sdk in dependencies

  pinned at "^1.0.4"

• MCP: SDK version pinned

  pinned at "^1.0.4"

• MCP: ESM package

  "type": "module"

• MCP: 8 tools declared

  start_session, get_diagram, export_diagram, list_pages

• MCP: server surface

  8 tools · 1 prompt

• Recent activity

  last push 3 days ago

• Tests detected

  1 test directory · 29 test files

• CI configuration detected

  GitHub Actions (5 workflows)

This artifact hasn't produced behavioral results yet: the evaluation sandbox couldn't run it (it may need credentials we don't provide, or a build our environment doesn't support). That's a limitation of our environment, not a verdict on the artifact.