Evaluation report
Warningsmcp-chrome-bridge · mcpf48e717· 3 months ago
Every check MetaHub ran on this artifact, grouped by area. Static checks run on the source at publish time; behavioral checks run the artifact in a sandbox and judge what it actually does.
Structural
5 passedRepository is reachable
https://github.com/hangwin/mcp-chrome @ f48e717 — ★ 12,087 · TypeScript · MIT · last push 6 months ago
Manifest detected
kind=mcp slug=mcp-chrome-bridge · path=app/native-server · source=package.json
Slug is URL-safe
"mcp-chrome-bridge" matches /^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]{0,62}$/
Slug is unique within kind
No collision found for mcp/mcp-chrome-bridge
Version is semver
1.0.29
Documentation
4 passed1 warningDescription qualitywarn
Only 4 words · 35 chars — more detail helps discovery
Tell consumers what this artifact does in a full sentence.
README is present and substantial
13,002 chars · 11 sections · 5 code blocks
Tags / topics declared
3 total — mcp, chrome, browser
README has usage / example sections
found: Installation · Usage
Homepage / docs URL declared
no homepage declared (registry will use the repo URL) — info-only, not blocking
Safety
2 passed1 warningDependencies: known vulnerabilitieswarn
6 high/critical advisories — @modelcontextprotocol/[email protected] (HIGH: GHSA-345p-7cg4-v4c7) · @modelcontextprotocol/[email protected] (HIGH: GHSA-8r9q-7v3j-jr4g) (+4)
Update the affected packages, then re-publish. (`npm audit` shows the same data locally.)
LICENSE file at repo root
LICENSE
No sensitive files in the repo
scanned for .env, credentials.json, *.pem, .ssh/, AWS / GCP configs — none found
Kind-specific
4 passed1 warningMCP: ESM packagewarn
package.json missing "type": "module"
Modern MCP servers are ESM. Add `"type": "module"` unless you have a CJS-only reason.
MCP: launch path
bin: mcp-chrome-bridge, chrome-mcp-bridge, mcp-chrome-stdio
MCP: @modelcontextprotocol/sdk in dependencies
pinned at "^1.11.0"
MCP: SDK version pinned
pinned at "^1.11.0"
MCP: server surface
0 tools
Maintenance
2 passed1 warningRecent activitywarn
last push 6 months ago — looks slowing down
Consumers prefer artifacts that are actively maintained (threshold: 90 days, configurable via EVAL_RECENCY_PASS_DAYS).
Tests detected
1 test directory · 39 test files
CI configuration detected
GitHub Actions (1 workflows)
Behavioral
This artifact hasn't produced behavioral results yet: the evaluation sandbox couldn't run it (it may need credentials we don't provide, or a build our environment doesn't support). That's a limitation of our environment, not a verdict on the artifact.