Evaluation report

• Repository is reachable

  https://github.com/bethington/ghidra-mcp @ 5c40d9c — ★ 2,720 · Java · Apache-2.0 · last push yesterday

• Manifest detected

  kind=mcp slug=ghidra-mcp-bridge · source=pyproject.toml

• Slug is URL-safe

  "ghidra-mcp-bridge" matches /^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]{0,62}$/

• Slug is unique within kind

  No collision found for mcp/ghidra-mcp-bridge

• Version is semver

  5.15.0

• Description quality

  14 words · 103 chars — OK but more detail helps

• README is present and substantial

  53,112 chars · 19 sections · 19 code blocks

• Tags / topics declared

  11 total — ai, binary-analysis, ghidra, ghidra-extension, java, mcp (+5)

• README has usage / example sections

  found: Installation · Installation · Installation (+4)

• Homepage / docs URL declared

  no homepage declared (registry will use the repo URL) — info-only, not blocking

• LICENSE file at repo root

  LICENSE

• No sensitive files in the repo

  scanned for .env, credentials.json, *.pem, .ssh/, AWS / GCP configs — none found

• MCP: launch path

  launch declared in pyproject.toml

• MCP: @modelcontextprotocol/sdk in dependencies

  non-Node server (pyproject.toml) — uses its language's MCP SDK

• MCP: ESM package

  non-Node server (pyproject.toml) — n/a

• MCP: server surface

  0 tools

• Recent activity

  last push yesterday

• Tests detected

  1 test directory · 70 test files

• CI configuration detected

  GitHub Actions (7 workflows)

This artifact hasn't produced behavioral results yet: the evaluation sandbox couldn't run it (it may need credentials we don't provide, or a build our environment doesn't support). That's a limitation of our environment, not a verdict on the artifact.