Evaluation report

• Repository is reachable

  https://github.com/grab/cursor-talk-to-figma-mcp @ 1c46823 — ★ 6,852 · JavaScript · MIT · last push 8 weeks ago

• Manifest detected

  kind=mcp slug=cursor-talk-to-figma-mcp · source=package.json

• Slug is URL-safe

  "cursor-talk-to-figma-mcp" matches /^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]{0,62}$/

• Slug is unique within kind

  No collision found for mcp/cursor-talk-to-figma-mcp

• Version is semver

  0.3.5

• Description qualitywarn

  Only 5 words · 24 chars — more detail helps discovery

  Tell consumers what this artifact does in a full sentence.

• README is present and substantial

  9,476 chars · 12 sections · 9 code blocks

• Tags / topics declared

  14 total — agent, agentic, agentic-ai, ai, ai-agents, automation (+8)

• README has usage / example sections

  found: How to use · Usage

• Homepage / docs URL declared

  https://www.figma.com/community/plugin/1485687494525374295/cursor-talk-to-figma-mcp-plugin

• Dependencies: known vulnerabilitieswarn

  3 high/critical advisories — @modelcontextprotocol/[email protected] (HIGH: GHSA-345p-7cg4-v4c7) · @modelcontextprotocol/[email protected] (HIGH: GHSA-8r9q-7v3j-jr4g) (+1)

  Update the affected packages, then re-publish. (`npm audit` shows the same data locally.)

• LICENSE file at repo root

  LICENSE

• No sensitive files in the repo

  scanned for .env, credentials.json, *.pem, .ssh/, AWS / GCP configs — none found

• MCP: launch path

  bin: cursor-talk-to-figma-mcp · scripts.start

• MCP: @modelcontextprotocol/sdk in dependencies

  pinned at "1.13.1"

• MCP: SDK version pinned

  pinned at "1.13.1"

• MCP: ESM package

  "type": "module"

• MCP: server surface

  0 tools

• Tests detectedwarn

  no test/tests/__tests__/spec/t/ dirs, no JVM src/test/, and no JS/TS/Python/Go/Ruby/Elixir test files

  Add tests (even a smoke test). Consumers gauge maintenance quality by their presence.

• CI configuration detectedwarn

  no CI config found (looked for GitHub Actions, CircleCI, GitLab CI, etc.)

  Add a simple workflow (lint + test on PR) — it tells consumers the artifact is built reproducibly.

• Recent activity

  last push 8 weeks ago

Behavioral results aren't published for this artifact. The publisher sees the full report on their own dashboard.